When being wrong
isn't an option.

Research intelligence for anyone who can't afford to be wrong

One AI can confidently make things up. MelMat runs four side by side and shows you exactly where they disagree — because that's where the risk hides.

–
sources reviewed
–
cited in briefs
–
unverifiable claims removed
–
mis-attached citations caught
–
contradictions surfaced
–
hours of work saved
Every brief is a dated record of what was verifiable that day.
Sources linked, disagreements preserved, date anchored, so the decision is defensible later.
Claims without a source are removed, citations that don’t hold are caught, the record stands.

98.6% of MelMat briefs land in our lowest hallucination-risk tier.
Most AI tools can't say that!

Start your 7-day free trial

Free for 7 days. No charges. Cancel anytime.

Not ready? See an example brief first

🔒 We never train AI on your chats.

Consultants · Executives · Investors & Analysts · Legal & Compliance · Clinicians · Researchers

"MelMat cuts through the noise and gives you the confidence that comes with true due diligence."

— Ivana, real estate professional
Claude
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Mistral
MiniMax
Kimi
Grok
M² Chat

Who it's for

If this sounds like
your work

M&A
Independent M&A & transaction advisors
You send a valuation to a buyer who has advisors on the other side — and no one checks the number before it leaves your desk. MelMat runs four engines on the same question and shows where they disagree, so the soft spot surfaces before the buyer's side finds it.
Legal & compliance
Fractional & outside general counsel
You give a position that a regulator or opposing counsel may read two years from now. MelMat leaves a dated, sourced record of what was verifiable the day you advised — so if it's reviewed later, you're not reconstructing from memory.
Consultants
Independent operating & strategy consultants
You're expected to have a defensible view on a sector you're seeing for the first time. MelMat does the reconciling four AI tools would take an hour to do by hand — one brief, showing what's solid and what to check before it goes in the deck.
Owners & executives
High-stakes calls on market entry or strategy that need more than one model's opinion.
Investors & analysts
Due diligence and thesis validation that need multiple angles before committing.
Marketing & growth teams
Competitive and audience research that has to be defensible, not just one model's take.
Clinicians & practitioners
Framework-grounded literature synthesis with named researchers and citations — a research aid, not a substitute for clinical judgment.
Academic & graduate researchers
Multi-source synthesis for literature reviews and gap analysis.
Others
If being wrong on a public fact costs you in your work, whatever the field, this is for you too.
Run one free query — no card

The problem

AI is only as good as
how you use it

Most people use one AI tool and take whatever it says at face value. That works for simple questions. For anything with real stakes — strategy, market research, competitive analysis — one model isn't enough.

One perspective

Every AI has different training data and blind spots. One answer is one opinion — not the full picture.

Copy. Paste. Repeat.

Running the same question through multiple AI tools manually wastes 30–45 minutes per query.

No synthesis

Even if you run multiple models, you still have to reconcile different answers yourself. That's the hardest part.


How it works

Research that covers every angle

01

Submit your question

Type your research question into the portal and select a focus — Strategic, Technical, Market, Clinical Research, or more. That's it.

→
02

4 engines run in parallel on every query

Your selected engines receive your question simultaneously. Perplexity grounds every response in live web sources — the others bring deep analytical reasoning.

→
03

Get a synthesized brief

A synthesis pass reconciles all responses into one professional brief — highlighting consensus, flagging contradictions, and delivering a clear action plan.


Engine selector

Choose your research stack

Pro+ users can customize which AI engines power their research. Pick 3 from your available pool — Perplexity is always included for live web context.

8 engines available 4 run per query

Claude
ChatGPT
Gemini
Mistral
MiniMax
Kimi
Grok
Perplexity always on

Starter: Fixed stack (Claude + ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity)
Pro: Pick 3 from 5 engines (+ Mistral, MiniMax) + Perplexity
Power: Pick 3 from 6 engines (+ Kimi) + Perplexity
Researcher: Pick 3 from 7 engines (+ Grok exclusive) + Perplexity


Chat AND Research

Other tools give you answers.
MelMat gives you confidence.

Other tools force you to choose: chat mode or research mode. MelMat gives you both — plus consensus, contradictions, and an action plan you can defend in front of a client, board, or partner. One workspace. One source of truth.

M² BRIEF
Multi-engine research synthesis
4 AI engines (out of 8 available) run in parallel. One synthesized brief with Executive Summary, Key Findings, Consensus Score, Contradictions & Tensions, and a structured Action Plan with named owners and thresholds. A hallucination sifter, every time.
M² CHAT
Chat. Persistent. Smart.
Chat about anything that matters. Other chats give you one model's answer — and one model's hallucinations. On M² Chat, every doubt becomes a multi-engine brief showing where 4 AI engines agree, contradict, or fall short. A hallucination sifter, every time.
DIG DEEPER
Brief-anchored follow-ups
Every brief becomes a conversation. Probe the contradictions, expand a finding, challenge the verdict — every Dig Deeper thread is anchored to the original brief and the raw model responses behind it.
Other tools have chat. Or research mode. They don't give you a Consensus Score, a Contradictions tab, an Action Plan, and a way to dig deeper into the parts that don't sit right. MelMat does. We don't just add value — we add confidence.

Verified Confidence

Hallucinations are the AI industry's
single biggest unsolved problem.

We don't claim to eliminate them. We verify and sift through them, as the numbers below portray. Every brief is independently evaluated by 4 verifiers — and the results are tracked, graded, and published.

MelMat
98.6%
of MelMat briefs land in our lowest hallucination-risk tier.
Most AI tools can't say that.
Patent
Pending
A MelMat brief header: consensus score, grounding bar, and the brief's own counts of sources reviewed, cited, claims removed, citations caught and contradictions
Every brief opens with its own numbers. Sources reviewed and cited, claims removed, citations caught, contradictions surfaced, the work it replaced.
A MelMat contradiction card: two positions with the engines holding each, what would settle it, the verdict, and the action it changes
Where the engines split, the brief names what would settle it. Both positions, who holds them, the verdict, and the action it changes.
*Internal benchmark: 577 graded briefs on the current architecture through August 2026. Each brief independently evaluated by 4 verifiers. Industry comparison: HALoGEN benchmark (2025). Methodology details available on request.

The founder

Built by someone whose job
was being right.

Vanja Todorovic, founder of MelMat
Vanja Todorovic
Founder, MelMat™ · Via Logixs LLC

25+ years in financial services, most recently VP of Mortgage Compliance at Wells Fargo — work where an unverified answer isn't an inconvenience, it's a finding. Inside a big firm, someone always checks your work before it goes out. On your own, that layer doesn't exist.

MelMat is that checking layer, rebuilt — four engines, live sources, and every disagreement surfaced instead of smoothed over.

I built MelMat myself, end to end: the four-engine pipeline, the grounding layer against primary sources, the verification and grading stack, the portal. It’s patent-pending, and it’s held to the standard I worked under for 25 years, where “probably right” isn’t a finding.

VP Mortgage Compliance · Wells Fargo Master's, Executive Leadership · Drake University MIT · AI & Machine Learning Johns Hopkins · AI in Healthcare CHPSE · HIPAA Privacy & Security
Based in Tampa. Works in English, German, Serbian, Croatian & Bosnian.
Embarc Collective Member, Embarc Collective · Tampa
Connect on LinkedIn
Run one free query — no card

From early users

Why people use MelMat

"If you care about using AI responsibly and are looking for deep, verified insights without chasing various sources for hours, MelMat does the work for you — it cuts through the noise and gives you the confidence that comes with true due diligence."

— Ivana, real estate professional

"The contradictions section saved me — three of the four models said one thing, Perplexity pulled live data that contradicted them. I was about to put the wrong number in a deck."

— Jamie, financial consultant

"It's slower than ChatGPT but I can actually defend what comes out of it. I don't read the whole brief — I read the consensus score, the contradictions, and the verdict."

— Kayla Moore, consulting

"The methodology page at the bottom is what got me to pay. I needed something I could point to when a partner asked 'how did you arrive at this.'"

— David Besana

"Dig Deeper is what I didn't know I needed. The brief gives me the answer; Dig Deeper lets me poke at the parts that don't sit right."

— Jordan Smithson, research

"Being able to see where different AI models agree and diverge on viewpoints is very helpful and cuts down on time required to verify outputs. I also really, really love the action plan. Succinct, specific, and actionable!"


Example briefs

See it before you
sign up

Actual MelMat briefs across legal, financial, technical, clinical, and strategic questions — four engines on every one, with the contradictions surfaced rather than smoothed over. One full brief is shown in its entirety below; the rest are previews.

Financial✓ Full brief
What are the current SBA 7(a) maximum loan amounts and guarantee percentages, and how have the 2025–2026 SOP changes affected eligibility for franchise borrowers and lender underwriting requirements?
4 engines · 34 sources · grounding CORROBORATED · Aug 30, 2026
Consensus ScoreSplit · 49%
The numbers were never in dispute — every engine agreed on the $5M cap and the 85/75 guarantee. The split is on eligibility: one engine answered from the old rules, live sources confirmed the Franchise Directory is back. That disagreement is what keeps a bad underwriting assumption off the page.
GroundingCORROBORATED
The load-bearing figures are anchored to 13 CFR Part 120 (Tier-1, verified in eCFR) and independently confirmed by both live-web voices.
Sources reviewed
34
Cited
17
Claims removed
6
Citations caught
0
Contradictions
4
Work saved
3 hrsapprox.

Summary

The SBA 7(a) maximum loan amount remains $5,000,000, with maximum SBA guaranteed exposure of $3,750,000 on standard loans [3], and guarantee percentages holding at 85% for loans of $150,000 or less and 75% for loans above that threshold under 13 C.F.R. §120.202 [5]. The material change for 2025–2026 is not pricing or size — it is eligibility gatekeeping: the SOP 50 10 revision effective June 1, 2025 reinstated the SBA Franchise Directory as the controlling eligibility mechanism, requiring any brand meeting the FTC definition of a franchise to be listed before a franchisee can be financed [13]. Layered on top are restored underwriting discipline — a reinstated 10% minimum equity injection for startups and changes of ownership [25], mandatory independent Quality of Earnings reports for acquisitions at $3 million or greater beginning October 1, 2026 [32], and an explicit anti-passive test requiring the borrower to control budgeting, staffing, and bank accounts [13]. If you are underwriting or applying for a franchise deal without first confirming the brand's live Directory listing and current franchisor certification status, you are exposed to a post-close guarantee denial on a loan you cannot unwind — the eligibility defect is not curable at repair.

Findings

  1. Loan size and guarantee percentages are unchanged — the $5M cap and 85/75 tiering are stable across all sources and confirmed by regulation. (High confidence) The $5,000,000 maximum and $3,750,000 maximum guaranteed exposure are confirmed on SBA's own lender guidance [3], and the 85%/75% split is set in 13 C.F.R. §120.202 [5], within the governing 13 CFR Part 120 framework [1]. SBA Express stays at $500,000 with a 50% guarantee [3]; Export Working Capital and International Trade at $5,000,000 with guarantees up to 90% [10].
  2. The Franchise Directory is back and is the binding eligibility test — not a lender-discretion affiliation analysis. (High confidence) The June 1, 2025 SOP reinstated centralized SBA review: franchisors submit the FDD, franchise agreement and ancillary documents for listing, and brands meeting the FTC franchise definition — applied broadly to licensing, dealer and distributor arrangements — must be listed for franchisees to qualify [13]. Multi-brand operators need each brand listed [13]. Gemini's live search independently confirms the reinstatement [29].
  3. The anti-passive / operational control test is the new decline trigger for franchise credits. (High confidence) Lenders must confirm the borrower retains control of budgeting and major expenditures, employee oversight, and bank accounts [13]. Master franchisees collecting royalties without operating units are ineligible; area developers who open and run their own units remain eligible [13]. Ghost kitchens, office suites and salon suites structured as space-licensors are named ineligible models [12].
  4. Underwriting has been re-tightened toward pre-2023 discipline, with new mandates for larger acquisitions. (Medium confidence) A 10% minimum equity injection is reinstated for startups and all changes of ownership [25]. From October 1, 2026, an independent Quality of Earnings report is required for acquisitions at $3 million or greater [32], with cash proof over the trailing twelve months and two prior fiscal years [33]; QofE-validated earnings, not seller add-backs, drive DSCR. Business acquisitions are reported removed from the streamlined Small Loan path [25].
  5. Eligibility narrowing on ownership citizenship is a live screening risk for operators with foreign capital. (Medium confidence) The standard is reported to require 100% of owners and guarantors to be U.S. citizens or nationals with U.S. principal residence, replacing the prior 51% rule [34]. One web-grounded source only; confirm against the current SOP text before restructuring any cap table.
  6. Training data vs current reality — the Directory was not eliminated. (High confidence) One analysis held that SBA scrapped the Directory and folded franchise review into affiliation analysis. Both web-grounded voices contradict this: the Directory was restored as the central eligibility tool effective June 1, 2025 [12], and lenders no longer perform brand-by-brand legal review once a brand is listed [13].

Consensus

All four analyses agree:

  • The 7(a) maximum loan amount is $5,000,000; the statutory cap set by the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 has not been raised [3].
  • Guarantee percentages remain 85% for loans of $150,000 or less and 75% above [5], producing maximum SBA exposure of $3,750,000 on a $5 million loan [3].
  • Pandemic-era 90% blanket guarantee enhancements have expired; 85/75 is the operative baseline.
  • SBA Express remains capped at $500,000 with a 50% guarantee [3].
  • The 2025–2026 SOP cycle is directionally a tightening — restored equity discipline, more prescriptive documentation, heavier scrutiny of control and independence.
  • Franchise borrowers face a materially higher documentation burden: FDD, franchise agreement, ancillary and management agreements all enter the file [13].
  • Passive and quasi-passive structures are the clearest disqualifier; the borrower must demonstrably operate the business [13].
  • Directory listing is not permanent — brands can be removed for rule violations or certification failure, so status must be confirmed at closing, not just at application [13].
  • The SOP changes affect who can access the guarantee and what lenders must document, not the maximums or percentages [15].
  • Smaller lenders without franchise expertise bear the highest relative compliance cost, showing up as longer cycle times on non-standard concepts.

Contradictions

Contradiction 1 of 4Is the SBA Franchise Directory eliminated or reinstated as the franchise eligibility mechanism?
Position A
Directory eliminated; franchise eligibility folded into lender-conducted affiliation and control analysis
Held by
Kimi
Evidence
Franchise review integrated into SBA size/affiliation standards; lenders bear independent analysis burden
Position B
Directory reinstated June 1, 2025 as the central eligibility tool with centralized SBA review and listing
Held by
Perplexity · Gemini
Evidence
Brands meeting the FTC franchise definition must be listed; franchisors submit FDD and agreements to SBA for listing [13] [29]
What would settle itLive SBA Franchise Directory listing status for the specific brand
VerdictResolved: B Resolved — the Directory is reinstated and is the binding test.
If A is rightLender performs brand-level affiliation analysis on every franchise credit
If B is rightLender checks Directory listing and franchisor certification status at application and again at closing
Action it changesThis week · item 1
Contradiction 2 of 4What was the franchisor re-certification deadline for Directory-listed brands?
Position A
July 31, 2025 deadline; addendum required in the interim; removal from Directory if not executed
Held by
Perplexity
Evidence
Applies to brands listed in the Directory as of May 2023 [13]
Position B
Final re-certification deadline extended to June 30, 2026; brands not certified are removed and franchisees ineligible
Held by
Gemini
Evidence
SBA extended the unified Franchisor Certification deadline [30]
What would settle itThe brand's current listing and certification status in the live SBA Franchise Directory
VerdictConditional The extension is the later-dated web finding, but both deadlines have passed — confirm per-brand listing status in the live Directory before quoting terms.
If A is rightDeals in pipeline before Aug 2025 may have closed under the addendum procedure
If B is rightBrands had through mid-2026 to certify; non-certified brands are now off-Directory
Action it changesThis week · item 1
Contradiction 3 of 4Did the 2025–2026 SOP loosen or restore equity injection and DSCR standards?
Position A
More flexibility: projected earnings supplement historical cash flow; DSCR minimums 1.15x / 1.20x for 25-year real estate
Held by
Kimi
Evidence
Standby seller financing counts toward injection when properly structured
Position B
Restored discipline: mandatory 10% minimum equity injection for all startups and changes of ownership
Held by
Gemini · Claude
Evidence
Reverses the 2023 rule permitting lenders to set their own equity requirements [25]
What would settle itCurrent SOP 50 10 text on equity injection minimums and DSCR floors
VerdictConditional On equity injection, resolved — the 10% floor is restored. On specific DSCR numerics, unresolved — verify directly in the current SOP text.
If A is rightDeals can be structured with lender-determined injection below 10%
If B is rightEvery startup and change-of-ownership deal needs a documented 10% injection at minimum
Action it changesThis week · item 2
Contradiction 4 of 4Do the 2025–2026 franchise SOP changes reduce access or increase predictability?
Position A
Net friction: slower originations, higher compliance cost, especially for smaller lenders and newer concepts
Held by
Claude · Kimi
Evidence
Enhanced documentation and control analysis add underwriting time per franchise credit
Position B
Net standardization: structured guidance on franchise definition, operational control, and categorical ineligibility
Held by
Perplexity
Evidence
Centralized SBA review replaces brand-by-brand lender legal review once listed [13]
What would settle itBrand maturity and current Directory listing status
VerdictBoth, by scope Both are correct at different scales — faster for listed established brands, a hard constraint for emerging concepts and quasi-passive structures.
If A is rightBudget longer cycle times and added legal review cost per franchise file
If B is rightStandardize intake around a Directory check and reallocate legal spend to control analysis
Action it changesThis month · item 1

Web sources

  • Agree — loan maximums and guarantee tiers. Both web voices independently confirm the $5,000,000 maximum and the 85%/75% split [3][5], with Gemini's live search corroborating the same figures from separate sources [19][26]. The strongest evidence in the brief short of the governing regulation itself [1].
  • Agree — Franchise Directory reinstated as the controlling eligibility mechanism. Perplexity cites the June 1, 2025 SOP change [13]; Gemini's live search independently confirms full reinstatement [29].
  • Disagree — franchisor certification deadline. Perplexity reports a July 31, 2025 execution deadline for brands listed as of May 2023 [13]. Gemini's live search reports the final deadline extended to June 30, 2026 [30]. Both dates are past; resolve by pulling the brand's live status from the SBA Franchise Directory, not from either summary.
  • Single web voice — 2026 structural expansions. The combined $10 million 7(a)+504 limit effective July 4, 2026 and the 90% "Made in America" guarantees are carried by one voice only [24][25]; verify against the SBA Procedural Notice and SOP 50 10 8.1 text before sizing a deal around them.
  • Single web voice — QofE mandate and Small Loan path restriction. The $3 million QofE trigger effective October 1, 2026 [32] and the removal of acquisitions from the Small Loan path [25] appear in one voice. Confirm in the SOP text before adjusting credit policy.

Verdict

The 7(a) program remains a well-priced risk on its face — $5,000,000 of capacity at a 75% guarantee above $150,000 [5] is unchanged and is not the variable that will determine outcomes in this cycle. The variable is eligibility documentation integrity, and specifically live Franchise Directory listing plus franchisor certification status at the moment of closing. Kimi's framing — that the Directory was retired and franchise eligibility now runs through lender-side affiliation analysis — is contradicted by both web-grounded voices, and any credit policy still operating on that assumption should be rewritten this week. Claude and Gemini correctly read the direction of travel toward restored discipline; Gemini's live-search detail on the reinstated 10% equity injection [25] and the $3 million Quality of Earnings trigger [32] is the operative underwriting picture, though the specific DSCR floor could not be independently confirmed and should be read out of the SOP text directly.

For a lender: this is a risk worth taking, conditional on a mandatory Directory-and-certification verification gate at both application and closing — without that gate, franchise 7(a) is a 100%-loss-exposure product wearing a 25%-loss-exposure label. For a franchise borrower: proceed if your brand is listed and you genuinely operate the business; if you are a master franchisee, a passive investor behind a management company, or a quasi-passive space-licensor concept, the program is closed to you and no amount of credit strength reopens it [13]. The verdict flips to negative only if the target brand's certification lapses or QofE-validated earnings fail to support a servicing DSCR — at which point the correct action is to kill the deal rather than restructure around the guarantee.

Action Plan

This week
  1. Pull the live SBA Franchise Directory listing and franchisor certification status for 100% of franchise brands in the current pipeline — each brand separately for multi-brand operators [13]. Target: zero unverified brands by end of week. Owner: credit operations lead.
  2. Rewrite the franchise eligibility section of the credit policy to replace any lender-side affiliation-analysis procedure with a Directory-check procedure at application and pre-disbursement. Owner: chief credit officer.
  3. Pull the current SOP 50 10 text from SBA.gov and read out the exact DSCR minimum, equity injection language and Small Loan path eligibility — not from secondary summaries. Owner: SBA compliance officer.
  4. Screen every pipeline franchise file for a management or ancillary agreement not disclosed in the FDD; flag any file where the borrower does not control budgeting, employee oversight or bank accounts [13]. Kill gate: any file failing the control test is declined, not restructured.
  5. Identify all pipeline acquisitions at or above $3,000,000 and confirm a Quality of Earnings engagement is scoped and budgeted [32]. Owner: deal team lead.
This month
  1. Build a standardized franchise underwriting checklist: Directory listing, franchisor certification, FDD, franchise agreement, ancillary and management agreements, and the four-part control test [13]. Target: 100% of new franchise files on the checklist within 30 days.
  2. Establish a panel of at least 3 pre-vetted Quality of Earnings providers with agreed fees and a 21-day turnaround [32].
  3. Re-underwrite every pipeline acquisition on QofE-standard earnings, seller add-backs stripped. Decision gate: any deal whose DSCR falls below the SOP minimum on validated earnings is re-traded or terminated within 15 business days.
  4. Audit ownership and guarantor structure on every file against the reported 100% U.S. citizen/national requirement [34]; escalate foreign ownership to compliance.
  5. Confirm equity injection source and documentation on all startup and change-of-ownership files against the reinstated 10% minimum [25].
  6. Verify FY 2026 guarantee fee brackets, including the manufacturer fee waiver on eligible loans up to $950,000 [9].
This quarter
  1. Implement automated monitoring for Directory removals across the existing franchise book [13]. Target: quarterly re-verification of 100% of franchise-brand exposures.
  2. Confirm with SBA whether the reported $10 million combined 7(a)+504 limit [24] applies to your borrower base; if so, build a multi-unit developer product that stacks the programs.
  3. Cross-train a minimum of 2 additional underwriters on the Directory, certification and control-test workflow.
  4. Evaluate the reported 90% specialty guarantee categories for manufacturers and food supply-chain businesses [24], contingent on confirming eligibility in the SOP.
  5. Model the guarantee-denial tail: quantify a 100% loss on the three largest franchise exposures and set a per-brand concentration limit. Target: no single brand above a defined share of total 7(a) exposure, set by ALCO within the quarter.
  6. Build a franchisor-facing intake process that flags brands with unexecuted or lapsing certification; require written franchisor confirmation of Directory status as a closing condition.

Financial

Investment thesis / risk summary

For lenders and franchise sponsors, the 2025–2026 SOP cycle does not change the economics of the 7(a) guarantee — $5,000,000 maximum, $3,750,000 maximum guaranteed exposure, 75% guarantee above $150,000 [3][5] — but it materially changes the probability that the guarantee is honored. The primary driver of value and risk is no longer credit quality alone; it is eligibility documentation integrity. A franchise loan booked on a brand that is not listed, not certified, or structured so the borrower is a passive investor is a loan whose guarantee can be denied at purchase, converting a 25%-loss-exposure asset into a 100%-loss-exposure asset.

Upside case

The optimistic scenario requires: the target brand is listed on the Directory with an executed Franchisor Certification; the borrower directly operates units rather than collecting sub-franchise royalties [13]; the borrower controls budgeting, employees and bank accounts with no management agreement that strips oversight [13]; a 10% equity injection is documented and sourced [25]; and all owners and guarantors satisfy the tightened citizenship standard [34]. Where those hold, centralized Directory review is genuinely faster than brand-by-brand legal review, and the reported $10 million combined 7(a)+504 capacity [24] materially expands financeable deal size for multi-unit developers. Fee relief remains a tailwind in targeted categories, with guarantee fees waived on certain FY 2026 manufacturer loans up to $950,000 [9].

Downside case & risk factors

Guarantee denial on eligibility defect. Directory inclusion is not permanent [13]; a brand listed at application may be off-Directory at closing, and the lender's unguaranteed exposure jumps from 25% to 100% of principal on a loan up to $5,000,000.

Passive-structure reclassification. Managed models, master franchise arrangements and quasi-passive concepts are explicitly ineligible [12][13]; deals structured pre-June 2025 may not be refinanceable or expandable under current rules.

Acquisition cost and timeline inflation at the $3M threshold. The QofE mandate [32] plus removal of acquisitions from the Small Loan path [25] adds third-party cost and weeks of diligence; deals priced on adjusted EBITDA will fail to service debt on validated numbers — expect re-trades or dead deals, not just delays.

Capital structure disqualification. The reported 100% U.S. citizen/national standard [34] can render a franchisee ineligible on cap table composition alone.

Key questions before committing
  1. Is every brand listed on the live Directory today, with an executed current Franchisor Certification [13]?
  2. Does any undisclosed management or ancillary agreement transfer control of budgeting, employees or bank accounts away from the borrower [13]?
  3. Is the borrower an operating franchisee or, functionally, a royalty-collecting master franchisee [13]?
  4. At $3 million or above, who performs the Quality of Earnings, at what cost, and what does DSCR look like on validated earnings with add-backs stripped [32]?
  5. Is a documented, sourced 10% equity injection in place for every startup and change-of-ownership transaction [25]?
  6. Do 100% of owners and guarantors satisfy the current citizenship and principal-residence standard [34]?

Sources

34 sources reviewed · 17 cited · grounding Corroborated (13 CFR Part 120 verified in eCFR; two live-web voices independently confirm the load-bearing figures). Cited references:

  • [1] 13 CFR Part 120 — Business Loans, governing regulation verified current in eCFR — Tier-1 primary.
  • [3] sba.gov — SBA lender guidance (loan maximums, guaranteed exposure, SBA Express) — cited.
  • [5] govinfo.gov — 13 C.F.R. §120.202, guarantee percentages — cited.
  • [9] nerdwallet.com — SBA loan rates and FY 2026 fee schedule — cited.
  • [10] sba.gov (legacy) — types of 7(a) loans, Export Working Capital and International Trade limits — cited.
  • [12] nwbusiness.org — SOP 50 10 summary, ineligible business models — cited.
  • [13] Baker McKenzie client alert — SBA Franchise Directory returns June 1, 2025 — cited.
  • [15] sba.gov — SOP 50 10 Lender and Development Company Loan Programs — cited.
  • [19] gosbaloans.com — 7(a) guarantee tiers (Google Search) — cited.
  • [24] sba.gov — 2026 procedural notice, combined 7(a)+504 limit (Google Search) — cited.
  • [25] security-banks.com — reinstated 10% equity injection, Small Loan path change (Google Search) — cited.
  • [26] sba.gov — loan maximums (Google Search) — cited.
  • [29] citrincooperman.com — Franchise Directory reinstatement (Google Search) — cited.
  • [30] frandata.com — franchisor re-certification deadline extension (Google Search) — cited.
  • [32] claconnect.com — Quality of Earnings requirement effective October 1, 2026 (Google Search) — cited.
  • [33] doeren.com — cash proof requirements for acquisitions (Google Search) — cited.
  • [34] lendio.com — ownership citizenship standard (Google Search) — cited.
Browse other examples
Example briefs · read-only · no query used
Start your 7-day free trial Run one free query — no card

Prompt generator

Not sure what to ask?
We'll help you ask it right.

The quality of your research depends on the quality of your question. MelMat includes a built-in Prompt Generator that turns a rough topic into a sharp, focused research question, so you get better answers every time.

MelMat Prompt Generator

Pricing

Start free. Scale as you grow.

Starter
$49/mo
50 queries / month
4 engines: Claude · ChatGPT · Gemini · Perplexity
Live web grounding via Perplexity
Research brief in portal + email
Chat While You Wait*
Dig Deeper*
Start free trial
7 days free · unlimited queries* · card required
*3 follow-ups per brief
Power
$179/mo
200 queries / month
7 engines: + Mistral · MiniMax · Kimi
Engine selector: pick 3 + Perplexity
M² Chat*
Dig Deeper*
Research brief in portal, email, and PDF
Start free trial
7 days free · unlimited queries* · card required
Fair usage applies
Researcher
$299/mo
300 queries / month
8 engines: + Grok exclusive
Engine selector: pick 3 + Perplexity
M² Chat*
Dig Deeper*
Research brief in portal, email, and PDF
Start free trial
7 days free · unlimited queries* · card required
Fair usage applies
All plans include a 7-day free trial with unlimited queries and chat* · Cancel before trial ends and you won't be charged · Upgrade anytime
* Fair use applies. Chat features vary by tier — see plan details above. Abusive query and chat volumes may result in trial suspension.
Why more than a $20 AI subscription? Because a $20 subscription gives you one model's answer and no way to know when it's wrong. MelMat runs four engines on the same question, checks them against live sources, and shows you where they disagree — the checking is what you're paying for. The math: a MelMat query runs about a dollar. Doing that same cross-check by hand takes 30–45 minutes. Your hourly rate does the rest.
Annual plans carry a real guarantee: cancel any time and we refund your unused full months (details in our Terms, Section 9.2). Monthly plans simply cancel at the end of the cycle.

FAQ

Common questions

What exactly is a research query? +
A research query is any question you submit through the portal. MelMat sends it to your selected AI engines simultaneously — up to 4 engines per query, with Perplexity always included for live web grounding. The responses are then synthesized into a single professional brief. One query = one complete multi-engine research brief.
What can I use MelMat research for? +
Anything you'd want a second, third, or fourth opinion on. From a mom researching how to wean 20-month-old twins from the bottle, to mapping out a 3-week family trip through Europe, to checking whether two prescriptions interact, to understanding the legal implications of an LLC vs S-Corp for your side business, to comparing three neighborhoods before making an offer, to finally figuring out what it actually takes to sail the world. The same engine that powers a financial advisor's due diligence also tells a parent which car seats actually score well in side-impact testing. If you'd Google it, ask ChatGPT about it, or call a friend for advice — MelMat gives you four AI perspectives instead of one, with citations, contradictions, and a clear verdict.
What's the difference between the tiers? +
Starter gives you 4 fixed engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity). Pro unlocks 2 additional engines (Mistral, MiniMax) and lets you choose which 3 to run alongside Perplexity. Power adds Kimi — Moonshot's highest-intelligence-index reasoning model. Researcher adds Grok — xAI's most capable reasoning model — as an exclusive option. Higher tiers also get more queries and larger file attachment limits.
Why is Perplexity always included? +
Perplexity is the only engine that grounds its responses in live web data. The other engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.) bring deep reasoning but work from training data. Perplexity ensures every brief includes current information — prices, news, recent events. That's why it runs on every query.
What's the difference between M² Chat, Dig Deeper, and Chat While You Wait? +
Three different ways to interact with your research. M² Chat is a full persistent chat workspace — included unlimited on Pro, Power, and Researcher. Threads are saved to your account, you can pick up where you left off, and you can escalate any thread into a full multi-engine brief with one click. Dig Deeper opens a follow-up conversation tied to a specific brief — probe contradictions, expand findings, or challenge the verdict with the full brief and raw model responses as context. Starter gets 3 follow-ups per brief; Pro+ is unlimited. Chat While You Wait is the lightweight chat panel that opens on Starter while a brief is being synthesized (~3 minutes), so research time isn't idle — capped at 3 messages per brief.
Will I be charged if I cancel during the trial? +
No. If you cancel before your 7-day trial ends, your subscription ends immediately and your card is never charged. You can cancel directly from your account or by emailing support.
What happens when I run out of queries? +
You'll see a notification in the portal when you reach 80% of your monthly cap. When you hit the limit, upgrade to the next tier to keep researching — your cap resets on your billing date each month.
How is MelMat different from just using Claude or ChatGPT directly? +
When you use a single AI model, you get one perspective. Different models have different training data, reasoning styles, and blind spots — they genuinely disagree on complex questions. MelMat runs 4 engines per query, selected from a pool of 8, and explicitly surfaces where they agree, where they contradict, and what the synthesis verdict is. Perplexity adds live web grounding. That's the research coverage you need before putting anything in front of a client — or to satisfy your own curiosity with confidence.
How do I log in? Do I need a password? +
No password. MelMat uses magic link login — enter your email, get a secure link, click it, and you're in. The link expires in 15 minutes and can only be used once. Sessions last 24 hours. We recommend logging off when you're done.
Can I use MelMat with confidential material? +
Queries are processed through enterprise API agreements with zero data retention — your data is never used to train any model, stronger protections than consumer AI tools. That said, MelMat does not claim to be HIPAA compliant and does not sign BAAs, so do not submit protected health information. MelMat also does not provide medical advice — all output is designed as an assist tool, not a diagnosis. For legally privileged material or MNPI, consult your compliance policies first: transmitting data to any third-party service can carry disclosure implications regardless of retention terms.